Cognitive Trap of Reflexive Control
(Когнитивная ловушка рефлексивного управления)

I rarely saw article in such depth. It helps immediately analyse current situation. This is a responsibility of a reader, to study it. Such analysts like Michael Hudson and Andrey Martyanov should give their thought from the point of their expertise.

[1] Source:
Google auto-translation
The operation to denazify Ukraine in the context of the World War
Операция по денацификации Украины в контексте мировой войны.
Sergey Glazyev - September 8, 2022, 0:39 am
Сергей Глазьев -8 сентября 2022, 0:39
(Possibly the same)


Here are my immediate comments resonated from this article. Feel free to correct.
Gas for ruble sale myth
Comrador's culture and Nikolai Gogol
[2]Russian obligations


1) this article may imply that Ukraine would not have decisive offence on the south in the near future.

Why? because U. does not need anythinig decisive: the goal is to prolong conflict and make most damage to Ukraine and Russia. U does not need to shorten the time of conflict.
U understands that it has no advantage in the south now. So why to attack? It may prolong conflict other way. Why to slaughter own Ukrainian troops in south attack if they can be slaughtered later?

So these "analysts" like Yurii Podolyaka saying that "decisive battle coming" may be wrong. And also the idea that time is on the Russian side is wrong. And if R MOD bites this decoy for imminent and desicive battle, the MOD is mislead. Because MOD may think that U goal is to win the battle? Again, no, the goal of U. is to lose, but to prolong and destroy Ukraine.
But again, read G. He said this better.

2. It is hard to belive "collecive Putin" will overcome "reflexive control". Because he has to admit many of own mistakes.

a) Obsession with the "international law" and suppressing liberation of Donbass in 2014 - 2022.

Wrong evaluation of West behaviour: it was thought that escalation in Dobass may lead to the war witht the West. Typical "reflexive control myth". It is a myth, because it is simply a logical error. Even in "some blogs" (they may know they are), the idea of the military liberation of Donbass was condemned as an idea of "sofa-generals" who does not understand geopolitics. But in fact it was simply a logical conclusion.
b) Which law to follow if a "partner" constantly breaks laws? Being "polite" with one who is not polite?
c) believing in Western variant of capitalizm and listening to undeducated charlatans like Anton Siluanov and Elvira Nabiullina.


3. The most effective control of the contry is "cognitive" or "refexive" control of the leaders. Beeing of CIA agent, one firstly will study habits, mental paths, of the leaders and then build the informational pyramid around the leaders via long-raging informational waves. This is like controlling a fish immersed in chaotic gas. All believes, contacts, friends, coworkers, socienty around a leader is random like a gas, but every gas has physical laws for the waves which propagate there and focusing these waves may produce desired effect.


4.
a) Some side myths. R MOD reports of Ukrainia losses are praised in pro-Russian blogs. This is a short thinking. These losses destroy Ukraine materially and discredit denazification goal. This is exactly what West wants. Why to praise them? It is a tragedy. It is actually and in the long term is a loss for Russia. Because Russia does slaughter "own people" even a brainwashed.

so, the strategy of R MOD based on maximum damage to human content of U. is wrong. It may be under "reflexive control" too. Military may think in military terms. G. thinks in global economico-military-political.

Based on this, it feels that the SMO must be achieved as fast as possible. Insted of slaughtering people (by applouding West), R. can immediately shut down all electricity, refineries, transportation in Ukraine and take over the late and noisy party immersed in the dark.

And if there will be a huger and misery in downed Ukraine, send Russian grain not to the West, but to help Ukrainian people. And prevent selling Ukrainian grain abroad which (by applouding West) with Russian short-thinking-help goes on.

b) Glaziev: "..Could the USSR have won the unification of Europe by the German fascists if the obligation to supply raw materials and materials to Germany had continued? ..."
(Мог бы СССР победить объединенную немецкими фашистами Европу, если бы продолжал выполнять свои обязательства по поставкам сырья и материалов в Германию? )

c) and possibly one of the most stupid myths and trends: some say West puts sunctions on Russia and R responds with sunction on them. Nothing is most stupid and wrong. Because R does exactly what West wants: break connection with Europe. R. don't need to make Europe to suffer. R. don't need to put Europe to knees and to crisis. This will only strengthen Russians adversaries.

Like making forwars sanctions on Ukraine. But see G. He said this better.

d) I think the analysts which possibly tend to have too narrow scope and tend to be "hurray" analysts" have to study this article. Like perhaps A.M. Why this? These are my raw thoughts: [2]

Konstantin Kirillov. September 17. 2022.

Self link.