Political schizophrenia continues: journalists lost direction.

The forgery

So far, possibly, 6+ million people watched badly forged interview. NBC News should fix it and apologize.

See authentic originals at the end of this article in “Credits”:

For example: text: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/54688
video( removed by NBCNews ): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIH1DAE-bgY

These are details of the forgery we saw so far: some parts of it are bad some worse:

1. Removing fragments inside of an answer, a real forgery “let us recall the movement Occupy Wall Street …“

2. Interview is truncated. Less than 11 minutes comparing to 20 minutes original. Not “deadly”, but why to call this interview “full”?

3. Insertions of other clips and photos, “spy theme”. Subtle changing of context and emotional background … this is not a direct lie so is not that bad it is mainly bad because it is still in the middle of the interview

4. this is a cut of the question, this is bad “If Mr Flynn and I had this kind of interaction, while you and I, we have spent an entire day together, and Mr Flynn was fired from his job, you then should be arrested and put in jail.“ …

5. some people say, the two questions from other interviews were merged distoring the impression

6. minor glitches:
…We are ready to listen to our partners, ready to listen to appraisals and assessments when it is done in a “friendly“ manner, …

Interview forgery is not a good thing even in respect to an ordinary person … Is it good to a President of some other contry? … He is too trustful to this correspondent … but the tricks allowed in the USA news media may be not allowed in Russia … The Russian MSM already surprised by these forgeries, for example


Slams shameful censoring and modification of Putin’s answers in Kelly’s interview. At time mark 14:12. … Words about Occupy wall street are cut out …

Google apparently bans own links to original and accurate interview

June 16, 2017.
By the naked eye, fifth of 6700 comments to NBC-posted forged interview are outraged and looking up for the original one.
But apparently, if to post comment with the link to original, Google entirely blocks this comment. But if to mutate the link, the comment does appear. For example: this link is allowed:

yfofuftfufbfef.fcfofmf/fwfaftfcfhf?fvf=ftfIfHf1fDfAfEf-fbfgfY

Remove “f”s which gives
youtube.com/watch?v=tIH1DAE-bgY
and this cannot be posted. Try yourself.

NBC has similar problems with Assad’s interview

By the way, this is interview is very similar with the other NBC News, Bill Neely, interview with Bashar al-Assad,

http://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/watch-full-exclusive-interview-with-syrian-president-bashar-al-assad-724734019921

It is similar with the inability of American journalist, Bill Neely, to follow up the meaning of answers and repeatedly asking the same questions again and again as it feels he has an answer which he not expect and stupidly trying squeeze the “right” answer from the opponent.

“How long the war will last?”, “don’t your want to go”, or (very similar to Putin) question about “betting on USA elections outcome”. In the eyes of the journalist, the USA election is very important thing, but in the eyes of Assad and Putin this does not matter. Indeed, these elections are just a show and “decoration” for US bureaucracy. The “Americans seems obsessed” with the value of choice between of two major candidates, which makes them weak to react how this percepted in the rest of the world.

What is different, that Bashar was more careful not to let the journalist to forge the video and did recording with own services.

But, after all, this is not Kelly’s or Neely’s fault, they are possibly brainwashed as other USAins. It is hard to overcome the narratives which were embedded in our minds. I may even consider them heroes who dared to make such interviews. Imagine, if they will do a interview with sympathy to Putin or Assad, they will be labeled as “dictator’s” mouthpieces, Russian agents, and have their career ruined as Michael Flynn, and possibly Tulsy Gabbard, Steven Cohen, or others …

Youtube Comments.

Hey, you guys are so precious. Some comments feel so sincere. This page became my favorite one for these days. Thanks Kelly for beeing cause of this page, even the interview is forged. And thanks to Mr. Putin. This is not his job to participate in shows. He has a Press Secretary, Dmitriy Peskov.

A bit sad that Mr. Putin has to waste the time for discussing so childish and primitive questions made in the spirit “bad-stupid-evil-guys make these things because they bad-stupid-evil”. Apparently, this fool logic does fool not only the viewers, but journalists themselves.

Peacock culture

NBC News should fix it and apologize. Before own and Russian audience.
Otherwise, should USAians ask Russia Today to provide original version and put English titles there?
But why foreign country should be involved in fixing our mess? Will we accuse it again for meddling with our affairs?
We are already trying to involve it in our government schizophrenic squabbles about election. For 6? months
we are conducting an “investigation” where proofs change, disappear, or exposed as fake, but accusations stay the same.
We expelled 35 Russian diplomats and put sanctions out of this. Why Russia does not require an apology? Because it is impossible to deal with schizophrenic. In return at time of expelling, Russian offered Kremlin Christmas tickets for children of US diplomats.

In USA, presidents are least important persons in the government. Their main job is in election shows and other masquerades when they are elected. They “come and go”, but policies stay the same.

Both Megyn Kelly and Donald Trump are a part of this peacock culture. This is probably why Mr. Trump was so sensitive to Kelly’s critics. On the other side, Mr. Putin is immune to show style conversation. Real leader lives in real world. In peacock world only show pretexts seem valid: gay marriages, “anti-feminism”, and peacock flag.

Nothing will happen when USA president will go to very long vacations. As, for example, did George W Bush, at the beginning of his term. The truck runs too deep in the tracks. It does not matter holds Mr. President the wheel or not. All things are decided by political elite and “bureaucracy” – deep state. The inauguration into peacock happens in first month after election. Mr. Trump has been finally subdued when he betrayed his crew member, Michael Flinn. After this, he suddenly no longer object of elite attack and discouraged journalist does not understand how to drop the charges which are no longer suggested from the bosses. Most stupid of them continue and show pictures with cut head.

The 40% of USA eligible electorate “understands” irrelevancy of voting. They don’t vote. “Democracy”.

Forgeryright (F) 2017 NBCNews.com

June 18, 2017. Today, things unfold in surprising way. Instead of making an apology for the forgery, NBC News begins removing authentic versions. On copyright grounds. For example, full version “Vesti” and differential version of Inessa S.

Version “Vesti” seems an authentic domestic Russian TV copy. Was Mr. Putin so naive that did not retain the copyrights for own interview? Was this interview broadcast on Russian TV legally? Then why NBC News removes this copy from Russian youtube channel?

Perhaps because of English subtitles. Perhaps for the same reason that Oliver Stone English version cannot be broadcast in Russia? Separation of copyrights? RT version is still alive.

Is this legal to take authentic domestic Russian version, put English subtitles there, and publish on Web? Who can tell? Please, any news on a topic are welcome …

Sorry and congratulations, dear American friends, you have a new law: Forgeryright protection.

As said in this interview … “You know, you’re just very resourceful people there, well done, probably your lives there are boring”

Credits

This page can be googled by keywords
speakup landkey.net
and then selected from recent posts

Man with lack of thought is dangerous

Please correct me where I am wrong.

Emmanuel Macron either is brainwashed or not smart when thinking on kinder-garden level about Syria. It is not in Syrian regime interest to make chemical attacks. Thinking this way is thinking in level of bad-guys which act just because they are stupid and bad. This mentality multiplied on natural desire to show own strength and “independence” at the start of presidency is dangerous for the country. Congratulations for the choice, the French people. The accent “…France would respond immediately to any use of chemical weapons…” is one of the first signs of this.

He is as dangerous as Trump who already started a war with Syria when launched missile attack based on unproved accusations. Macron seems able to drag own country into the war too. Which would add normal Syrian citizens to the list of non-France-sympathizers. Is it not enough of ongoing terror attacks in the country? Congrats for the choice.

PS:

Macron warns over Syrian chemical weapons in frank meeting with Putin
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/macron-warns-putin-over-syria-in-frank-first-meeting-versailles
…“A very clear red line exists on our side – that is the use of chemical weapons by whomever,” Macron said at a joint news conference after his first meeting with the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin. …

Here is French assessment of chem. attack. Possibly done in style of “Iraq WMD 2003”.
I am not sure does it worth analysis and time, but perhaps someone already analyzed. If one knows, please give a link. For the save of those who still believe in “bad-guys”.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/26/syria-assad-forces-carried-out-sarin-attack-says-french-intelligence

“Based on this overall evaluation and on reliable and consistent intelligence collected by our services, France assesses that the Syrian armed forces and security services perpetrated a chemical attack using sarin against civilians,” the report says.

http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/country-files/syria/events/article/chemical-attack-in-syria-national-evaluation-presented-by-jean-marc-ayrault

http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/170425_-_evaluation_nationale_-_anglais_-_final_cle0dbf47-1.pdf
http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/170425_-_national_evaluation_annex_-_anglais_cle81722e.pdf

One is not a patriot if not able to share a shame of own country

May 30, 2017.

Before 1990, “The Voice of America” (VA) radio station cited such patriots like “Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn”, “Andrei Sakharov” and criticized such front-end bureaucrats like Leonind Brezhnev.
Patriot’s works were banned in their own country.

Today, rt.com, the web site “Russia Today”, cites such patriots as Oliver Stone, Steven Cohen, Robert Fisk, Noam Chomsky, Tulsi Gabbard, Vanesse Beeley, Theodore Postol, Udo Ultkaffe, Michael Hudson, Ron Paul and gives them voice there. And criticizes front-end bureacrats like Barak Obama, George W. Bush, Donald Trump. Some of patriot works are practically banned like Oliver Stone’s “Ukraine on Fire”.

During 1970x – 1980x I did listen VA every other day/month. Today I even not sure does this station exist or not. Today, rt.com is much better source of critical information than all of the USA MSM together.

VA was heavily jammed by Soviet authorities, and I have to constantly rotate the radio handle to keep frequency in tune. Listening VA was quite a work. Today, rt.com is under “informational attack jamming”, although even western courts are not able to prove that it distorts information.

PS. Here they are:

https://chomsky.info/
…link “Articles” is possibly main source
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Postol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fisk

Ron Paul
… https://www.ronpaul.com/
… http://ronpaulinstitute.org/

Very sensitive point in Syria war

For the thesaker.is
Relates to “Anonymous on April 18, 2017 · at 6:56 pm UTC”

Please correct me where I am wrong.

Imagine, foreign ships sailed to USA cost near New York, fired 59 missiles to nearby US airbase, killed few … These ships would be immediately destroyed by American patriots in routine defense.

When Russia did not do the same sinking of offending missile ships on April 6, she gave a hint: she won’t intervene if USA will even carpet bomb SAA.

Of course, when R. came in 2015, she should make her mind to shoot or not to shoot if US / Syria war breaks. Apparently, the policy is not to shoot. This means an entire adventure bound to fail and entering the Syria theater is completely useless except of demonstration how well R abides the laws over corpse of Syria.

Shoot / not to shoot has nothing to do with nuclear risk which is based on N. parity. If parity was not in R favor, she would be a dust a ten years before.

Therefore, there is no sense for USA not to destroy SAA piece by piece. Who cares?

Then Syria falls, and R is pushed back to her borders. Then? Then the policy may be change.

With non-attacking, R. spoils own reputation by missing straight moral stand. There are thousand pros against moral stand, “non-legal”, “carefulness”, “internal opposition”, loss of life”, “nuclear risk” … But people’s minds, in both opponent and friend camps, still respect when one is just flat fair.

I think, this would be a good idea to put the policy “if … to shoot” in  referendum in Russia. Why not to say to people directly: “Hey, we may by-stand, but the Daesh/Al-Quaeda will be in Damascus. Then good bye Syrian friends, culture, precious social diversity, and democracy.”  In Soviet Russia, memories about Spain Civil War 1930s were sacred.

PS:

It is also interesting why USA did the missile attack. Chem. attack, USA knows, this was a bluff. According to above logic, they simply tested R. There is no other reason. Unless US government is in complete disarray. Like wolf, as it said, before an attack, makes circles around a human testing him for a fear.

R. is also a “lunatic” in diplomacy. Aways tries to sign agreements with USA which cannot be kept while the partner is crazy, non-aggeable (separation of Al-Quaeda/moderates), and ignores the laws.

Negotiation must wait till and for reasonable partner.
Otherwise, R only loose and continue loosing, by

1. loosing time,
2. spoiling relations with Iran, Syria,
3. helping terrorists,
4. when agreements are broken, the part of moral responsibility is on both,

R. possibly “fools” own self because:
She was not in the same skin as Iran, which stood alone for decades against all of the World and has no illusions about USA. Her diplomats still remember reasonable leaders in the past: Reagan, …

The same dishonesty was in Donbass when advance of rebells was artificially frozen in 2014. What for? Russian reputation could not be damaged any worse. NATO did not attack R. calculating not having enough advantage.

Result is continued slaughter of Donetzk for 2 years. Today, militia in Donbass a bit demoralized, “what for we fight”, why these Minsk agreements? …

Russian government mantra “Ukranians are our brothers in blood” … is this not a self deception? Yes, this is what every Soviet pioneer has been taught, but reality is that these “brothers” do not stand up against Nazi propaganda and disprove this mantra every day. Why not to face a reality and let one rip what one saws?

Unproved accusations is a lie

apr11

manipulators

Finally Donald Trump became totally zombied … either non-listening to CIA or completely misled by them, whatever.
He crossed a redline himself. One would forgive Trump everything which reported from mass media, “sex scandals”, “racism”, “fraud” because the purpose of it was taming and framing him. But lying on moral issue is really what he does himself. Watch out, now when he is tamed, all accusations about “sex” or “Russian connection” will fade away.

If you are diligent enough you will find this, but for speed
here is an analysis of the video by medical experts:

Here is the transcript with more revelations:

White Helmets Movie: Updated Evidence From Swedish Doctors Confirm Fake ‘Lifesaving’ and Malpractices on Children

where should I start my homework?:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-06/evidence-calls-western-narrative-about-syrian-chemical-incident-question

http://necpluribusimpar.net/chemical-attack-syria/
no single proof? News without proof is a lie:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/world/middleeast/chemical-attack-syria.html?_r=0

details no-proof?: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3541843/posts
don’t see a proof: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/activists-say-gas-attack-kills-civilians-in-syria-as-eu-leaders-discuss-reconstruction/2017/04/04/16093d24-190a-11e7-8003-f55b4c1cfae2_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.9d41347c6936

======================
evedence before the news? good: details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnSAB4qeDug
US helps Al?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Pdomq8iaZs

Unreported Visit

By strongly confirmed but confidential source from CIA, the current President of US, Donald Trump, visited few times Russian Empire in 1905.

The purpose of visits was a secret delivery of computer codes of Democratic Party to Russian hackers at Armory Chamber ( “Оружейная Палата” ) in Kremlin. The program of undermining of USA security has been founded by the Tzar Ivan The Terrible.

The deal has been secured by Russian gold delivered and buried in remote Alaska lands. There are no records in Mr. President 1905 year tax which proves he dug gold out illegally.

In his time, Ivan The Terrible already occupied USA territory, Alaska, but met the strong resistance of Internet servers and lack of lobby in US Government.

The first know attempt to break CIA codes by Siberian secret agent Ermak is pictured below during his famous attack of Alaska.
cracking-the-code

April 5, 2017.

If we are so good, why are we letting the horror to go?

This was a final song at Loyola Hall concert at University of Chicago
March 3, 2017.

Everyone starts with the National Anthem of own choice. But the cacophony transforms to something incredibly beautiful at the end.

(Sorry, for my ugly singing … I was taken by surprise with the order “everybody sings”)

By Lloyd Stone and Jean Sibelius:

This is my song, O God of all the nations,
a song of peace for lands afar and mine;
this is my home, the country where my heart is;
here are my hopes, my dreams, my holy shrine:
but other hearts in other lands are beating
with hopes and dreams as true and high as mine.

My country’s skies are bluer than the ocean,
and sunlight beams on cloverleaf and pine;
but other lands have sunlight too, and clover,
and skies are everywhere as blue as mine:
O hear my song, thou God of all the nations,
a song of peace for their land and for mine.

……
……

but, if we are so good, why are we letting the horror to go?

Iraq war. Iraq civil war. Afghanistan. Libya, Syria war. “Revolution in Ukraine” hijacked by our CIA with genocide and blockade of Donbass.

Why don’t we sing “We don’t do body counts”? We should sing what we do. That’s the “song” of our national government.

It is easy to sing in warmth of our beautiful Loyola Hall and then going to our cosy houses with stable security and comfort of our jobs.

It is not easy to put aside a bit of the time and do our homework of analyzing the news, facts, and our Country’s history to resist everyday MSM lies.

Like very minor crowd of consciously awakened people do:

Vanesse Beeley, Noam Chomskiy, Tulsi Gabbard, The Saker, …

And yes, everyone knows for sure, this will be a family disaster to become a target of MSM like Donald Trump, Steven Cohen, Udo Ultkaffe, …
those who dared to speak up crossing, even slightly, the course of our National Ship …

*

KVK

*

References:

“This Is My Song” by Lloyd Stone and Jean Sibelius
The Event
Event’s host home

Vanesse Beeley

Noam Chomskiy

Tulsi Gabbard

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard interviewed after her trip to Syria (UPDATED)

The Saker
Steven Cohen
Udo Ulfkatte
We don’t do body counts

I am living here

We found this movie here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sXIJ7bp8F8
Published on Aug 20, 2014

i-am-living-here-small


-Apparent Junta fighters question imprisoned Donbass rebels.
-If you find inaccuracy in our close capturing of this interrogation, please let us know.
-We did not use special software for recognition, did the job by naked ears.

-Interrogators ask how much rebels are being paid …

0.20 -Downed-to-the-ground-prisoner is being asked:
0.20 Interrogator: Speak up.
0.22 Interrogator: Don’t you have family?
Prisoner: … I did not understand …

0.26: Interrogator:
Does a family exist? exist?
Why the f. came you here?

-Prisoner tries to say something but not clear.
Interrogator: Whom you are f…ing here?

0.28: Prisoner: I am living here …
-But interrogator seems too preoccupied with own agenda and does not
-pay to attention to prisoner’s words …

0.29 Interrogator: Why the f. you are f…ing here?
Whom are you f…ing here? Ukranians f. ?
Prisoner: I am f…ing you.

0.32 Interrogator: Bitch. Now, f., landing to you, f. end to you.
It’s time to pray for you, crud.

– I did not see the proof these people are paratroopers.
By the way, this prisoner has grey hair, and it is unlikely Russia recruits olderly people in regular service anyway.
Relatives, if any, can easily recognize him and tell who is he.

Nasty video made by junta fighters speaks against
them more than any pro-Russian propaganda.

This movie disappeared from Youtube now, on October, 2016. What is this? Censorship?
Someone caught in liing?
What are the name of these people and their fate?

Why DemocracyNow.org lies?

Why Democracy Now ( DN ) lies on Syria?

It may be true the Assad Regime is complicit in crimes. But, attributing to it more crimes that it done has no excuse. DN knows very well that nearly without exceptions, US actions towards Syria, Iran, Iraq are dishonesty, coups, bribing authorities, covert operations which are either done secretly or camouflaged as a promotion of democracy. US does not intend to change this course simply because there is no apology for any of action it made during 60 years. One who always lies, is not expected to change overnight.

For the start up, we can look here: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/02/rfk-jr-why-arabs-dont-trust-america-213601?o=1

Now about DN. Please look below. My comments start with ***.

Case I.

http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/20/headlines/syria_regime_airstrikes_kill_40_partial_ceasefire_collapses
APRIL 20, 2016
Syria: Regime Airstrikes Kill 40; Partial Ceasefire Collapses

This feels like a straight lie. It is unproven who made the “strikes”, but the title makes an impression that it is proven, and proven that SAA did this. Pretending that non-proven thing is proven is a direct lie.

If to read further:
DN: “… The strikes are the latest in a series of ceasefire violations by the Assad regime…..”
Who said that Assad made this violation? No one. DN just invented this by paraphrasing Kirby’s article:
“…U.S. State Department spokesperson John Kirby confirmed Tuesday’s strikes were likely carried out by Assad’s forces and that strikes compromise the ongoing Geneva peace talks….”
First note, “confirmed” contradicts with “likely”. The entire phrase makes an “confirming” impression, at the same time, trying to avoid being caught in straight lie by saying
“likely”.

Here is where DN bases its conclusion:
John Kirby: “It is our understanding at this time that it was most likely regime forces, but information is still coming in. Obviously, when there still continues to be violations of the cessation and there continues to still be people that are being barrel-bombed and gassed and denied basic food, water and medicine, that makes it very difficult for the opposition to participate fully in these talks.”

So even the spokesman of US ( which, as we know for 60 years, avoids the truth ) is afraid to confirm “Assad did it”, but DN already jumps to this condemning conclusion.

Here are more tricks in Kirby’s article:

John Kirby: “It is our understanding at this time that it was most likely regime forces, but information is still coming in. … ”
*** Yes, Kirby must say this because he does not have information and should be not caught in lying.

“… Obviously, when there still continues to be violations of the cessation and there continues to still be people that are being barrel-bombed and gassed
and denied basic food, water and medicine, … ”

*** it slides to make an impression that the guilt of violation is on SAA. About chemical attacks: it make no sense for SAA do this.
Why SAA will do suicidal things to discredit political image of own regime?
Only Western auditorium targeted and brainwashed by such propaganda can believe in such kiddish things.

“… that makes it very difficult for the opposition to participate fully in these talks….”
*** this seems illogical and wrong. Talks are in Europe, how violence in Syria can prevent opposition in participation? This also increases impression that
opposition is not the one who is responsible in continued violence.

DN:
“Earlier this week, the main opposition group pulled out of the Geneva peace talks, citing ceasefire violations by Assad’s regime and “no real will for a political solution.”
*** This is an another illogical statement. Increased violence is not the reason to stop talking.

After all, the traditional US dishonesty at the crime level, make it reasonable to believe that these “air attacks” and “chemical attacks” are false flags crafted by US or it’s allies.

Case II.

http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/29/headlines/state_department_condemns_assad_s_attack_on_aleppo_hospital
State Department Condemns Assad’s Attack on Aleppo Hospital
APRIL 29, 2016

Presenting non-confirmed information as confirmed is a lie.
It would be not a lie if titled as: “State Department Condemns Attack on Aleppo Hospital”
This is the second lie in 10 days. Hard to believe that DN did this information distortion accidentally.

Attacking Hospital is outstanding crime and it is really bad that DN plays disinformation in such bitter topic.

PS:
There is good chance that, this “news” about “hospital” is a really false flag: … look here … ( Sweden? article )
http://www.proletaren.se/utrikes-mellanostern/aleppo-has-been-under-fire-terrorists-four-years

In next days, I did not see any proofs who did the attack. The topic somehow disappeared from the news. Quite typical,
news made accusations and then nobody cares what it really was. Sad to see, that DN joined the standard US media brainwashing model.

DN makes a great job and, for years, it was the only web-site with honest news for me in US.
The mental discipline is one of the DN strengths. Why to break it?
It is very alarming that DN is so negligent in regards to Syria news.

And few words about image of Assad. This image has been created by the US-propaganda machine. DN knows very well how it works.
Possible good place to start is here: http://acloserlookonsyria.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page

Konstantin Kirillov.
Chicago, IL.

PS:
Here is a full text of DN article I. It has not link to Kirby’s text:
http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/20/headlines/syria_regime_airstrikes_kill_40_partial_ceasefire_collapses

In Syria, the partial ceasefire between Bashar al-Assad’s regime and opposition groups has collapsed, after airstrikes killed about 40 people in a crowded market in the rebel-held town of Maarat al-Noaman in Idlib province. The market had been the site of protests against the Assad regime in recent weeks. The strikes are the latest in a series of ceasefire violations by the Assad regime. U.S. State Department spokesperson John Kirby confirmed Tuesday’s strikes were likely carried out by Assad’s forces and that strikes compromise the ongoing Geneva peace talks.

John Kirby: “It is our understanding at this time that it was most likely regime forces, but information is still coming in. Obviously, when there still continues to be violations of the cessation and there continues to still be people that are being barrel-bombed and gassed and denied basic food, water and medicine, that makes it very difficult for the opposition to participate fully in these talks.”

Earlier this week, the main opposition group pulled out of the Geneva peace talks, citing ceasefire violations by Assad’s regime and “no real will for a political solution.”

There is no link to Kirby’s text.
–Apparently this is this citation:
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2016/04/255961.htm#SYRIA

John Kirby
Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
April 19, 2016
MR KIRBY: We’ve seen the reports of that. It is our understanding at this time that it was most likely regime forces, but information’s still coming in. So I want to be a little careful here on how I couch that. And it has been – as we’ve said, by and large, the majority of the violations have been by the regime. We have reason to believe at this point that that was the case with this particular bombing.
….
Now to your point, Elise, obviously, when there still continues to be violations of the cessation and there continues to still be people that are being barrel-bombed and gassed and denied basic food, water, and medicine, that makes it very difficult for the opposition to participate fully in these talks – and we understand that – which is why the cessation was so important, to have it in place. And I would remind you that while we – I’m certainly not going to walk you away from the notion that there have been additional violations in the last week or so – the violence has increased from what it was a week ago – it is still dramatically down from what it was just a couple months ago before the cessation, to the degree – and I think Mr. de Mistura said it was about 70 percent; where it had been 80 to 90 percent reduction in violence, it’s now about 70.
–the end of citation

–Citing for Case II:
DN:
The U.S. State Department has condemned Wednesday’s airstrike on a Doctors Without Borders-supported hospital in Syria. The organization says the airstrike killed at least 50 people, including doctors, nurses and patients. On Thursday, State Department spokesperson John Kirby said the airstrike was likely carried out by the Syrian regime.

John Kirby: “We obviously find this attack reprehensible in every possible way. We’re looking at dozens, if not several dozens, of casualties in this strike on what was clear that was a medical facility. The details and the circumstances of the attack are still coming in, but it sure bears all the hallmarks of the kinds of strikes that the regime has done in the past on treatment facilities and, frankly, on first responders.”

Kirby’s citing:
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2016/04/256700.htm

John Kirby
Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
April 28, 2016
….
Now just briefly before we start, I want a quick note on this airstrike, which I know many of you have covered or have asked about, in Aleppo on a Doctors Without Borders hospital. And I want to preface this by saying I think you’re going to hear something more specific from the Secretary soon on this. But I didn’t want to relinquish the podium at the outset without mentioning that we’re obviously – find this attack reprehensible in every possible way. We’re looking at dozens, if not several dozens, of casualties in this strike on what was clear that was a medical facility. The details and the circumstances of the attack are still coming in, but it sure bears all the hallmarks of the kinds of strikes that the regime has done in the past on treatment facilities and, frankly, on first responders.

So once again, we call on the regime to cease these absolutely senseless attacks, which are, of course, violations of the cessation of hostilities

–End of Citing for Case II.

When USA bubble-of-lies will blow up?

March 10, 2015.

When American bubble-of-lies will blow up?
It grows and grows since J. Bush lies about Iraq WMD and starting a war.
There is even no indication of apology for wrong doing.

The apology will be inevitably happen like in case of American slavery and racism. It took probably 200 years for that though.

And who will become sick of lies first? Zombied and brain-manipulated American citizen? New American politician?

So, today the bubble of lies is fed up from interpretation of Ukrainian events and interpretation of civil war in Donbass.
From interpretation of Crimea history.

….